This is not a Plan of Action case. Writing one answers a question nobody asked.
An INFORM Consumers Act suspension is a document-matching problem on a 10-day statutory clock, not a policy appeal. US law requires Amazon to suspend selling if verification is not completed after a non-compliance notice, so no appeal wording changes the outcome — only matching bank, tax and address documents do.
Most deactivations are Amazon exercising discretion. This one is not. The INFORM Consumers Act is US law, and Amazon is legally obliged to suspend selling for non-compliance. It has no discretion to be persuaded.
Sellers with 200 or more transactions and $5,000+ in gross revenue over a 12-month period. It requires annual re-certification of bank, tax and address details. Sellers above $20,000 in annual revenue also have their name and address publicly disclosed.
"Character for character" is not an exaggeration. A suite number present in one record and absent in another is enough to fail an automated match.
This is the one category where real outcome data exists. In January 2026, US Senator Durbin's office published figures gathered from 46 online marketplace operators:
So roughly half came back — which also means half did not. That is a real rate from a government source, unlike the 95%-plus figures advertised by reinstatement services, which are self-reported by firms that choose which cases to accept.
Five tools that take you from the notice to one properly prepared appeal — a Plan of Action builder that checks your wording against known rejection triggers, a 48-hour checklist, three worked examples, and a 90-day money plan. $149, one payment.
Get the kit — $149Not affiliated with Amazon. Not legal advice. No tool or service can guarantee reinstatement — Amazon makes that decision. If large sums are frozen, if you are accused of counterfeiting or a safety breach, if you have been rejected more than once, or if your notice cites Section 3, get a lawyer who specialises in Amazon seller cases.
Where Amazon's own wording is quoted it is marked as such. Practitioner guidance is labelled as practitioner guidance. Where sources disagree, this says so rather than picking one.